When I returned the car, a damage report was created on collection. It was perfect but I appreciate they do reserve the right to reinspect. Somehow, between collecting the car from me and it arriving back at the depot of their contractor 250 miles away, they managed to find over £1500 worth of damage. Damage included items such as accident damage (when I had not had an accident), chipped windscreen (which wasn't there on collection and would have been seen if it was), a missing charger (despite a box ticked on collection that the charger was there), a 'retail image' which I can only assume is then trying to charge my to sell the car on, a valet of the car even though again, on collection it was ticked that the car was clean inside and out and they then drove it 250 miles to their depot. These are just the few that stand out in my head. There was more. Photos accompanying the alleged damage were unclear with lots of glare so you couldn't make out the damage.
Edited: Hi Samantha, I can't see an away to reply to your response below so I will do it here by editing.
Thank you for taking the time to respond. While I appreciate that your inspections are supposed to follow guidelines, the photos sent of alleged damage were not in anyway clear. The lighting in the warehouse where the photos were taken mean the photos show a lot of glare and I cannot clearly see damage or that it is anywhere near the measurements on the ruler that is held up. Your driver who collected the car ticked 'clean inside and out' on the collection report at the time. He then drove it 200 miles to your contractors warehouse. On reinspection I was charged £70+ for a valet. How is this fair? Additionally in one of the photographs I can see the drivers lunch packaging in the drivers door!
Furthermore, the report from your contractor initially said I returned it without the charger. Again, this is despite the initial collection report stating I returned it with the charger (because I did). The car in question only ever comes with one charger as standard - I knew this already and have confirmed since. I even spoke to other people who had taken delivery of the same car a week earlier who all stated it comes with one charger and that Octopus do not provide an additional one, yet your contractor suggested I should pay £350 for one they claimed was missing! An attempt at charging me £70+ for a 'retail image' which I can only assume is an image to advertise the sale of the car was also present on the report carried out by your contractors. Why was I being charged this?
These are all just some of the things that I feel are unjust about the inspection report - there are others as well. I am dealing with a lot of personal stress at the moment. I resigned from my job due to a disabled child and won't be working again for the foreseeable future. In addition since January I have had two relatives in hospital and one die. While none of this is anything to do with Octopus, dealing with what I feel is an unfair inspection report, and not having my very detailed complaint letter responded to for almost two months (and counting) is something I really could do without on top of everything else.
I received the form after you responded to my review which requested my email address. I filled this in two days ago and have not yet received a response. This is in addition to my letter disputing the charges sent in early January.