did not give me right info and my…
did not give me right info and my teacher was screaming at me to the point I started to cry and I failed Psychology because of this website.

CrowdTrust is a review platform dedicated to providing consumers with reliable insights and evaluations of various products and services. By leveraging user-generated content and expert reviews, the company aims to facilitate informed decision-making for individuals seeking trustworthy feedback. Its platform serves a diverse audience, including consumers, businesses, and service providers, focusing on enhancing transparency and accountability in the marketplace. Through comprehensive reviews and detailed articles, CrowdTrust strives to foster an environment where users can share experiences and opinions about the companies they engage with. By emphasizing authenticity and credibility, the company positions itself as a valuable resource for those looking to navigate the complexities of online reviews and ratings in various sectors.
Reviewers express significant dissatisfaction with News Medical, highlighting issues with the accuracy and reliability of the information provided. Many customers report encountering misleading titles and incorrect data, particularly regarding COVID-19 studies, which has led to serious consequences for some users, such as academic failures.
The site is criticized for promoting biased content and lacking credibility, with several reviews pointing out its questionable standing and reliance on low-quality studies. However, a minority of users appreciate the site for its selection of articles, particularly praising its coverage of COVID-19 and its utility as a reference source for medical writing. While some find it helpful for accessing relevant information, the overwhelming sentiment reflects a lack of trust in the site's content. Overall, the majority view is negative.
Summary generated with AI from recent reviews
Each source counts by its number of reviews. Only reviews written by people are scored.
| Source | Rating | Reviews | Weight | 6-mo | Fake risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Trustpilot Low volume · weighted down | 2.3 | 9 | 100% | — | ● Not enough data |
Monthly average rating from reviews written by people · latest review Oct 2023.
| Month | Average | Reviews |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 23 | 1.0 | 1 |
| Feb 23 | 1.0 | 2 |
| Mar 23 | — | 0 |
| Apr 23 | 1.0 | 1 |
| May 23 | — | 0 |
| Jun 23 | — | 0 |
| Jul 23 | — | 0 |
| Aug 23 | — | 0 |
| Sep 23 | — | 0 |
| Oct 23 | 1.0 | 1 |
Share of positive (4–5★) and negative (1–2★) reviews mentioning each topic · based on the 9 most recent reviews.
“I have been using News Medical to find articles on Covid-19”
“An Observational Cohort Study", Preprints This site has observable paid content bias”
Same method for every company: overall rating, legitimacy checks, the average rating of reviews mentioning each area and the 6-month trend · News & Media.
| Company | Overall | Legit | Website & app | Trend | Reviews |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.3 out of 5 (poor) | 67 out of 100 | 2.6 out of 5 (poor) | — | 9 | |
| 2.2 out of 5 (poor) | 100 out of 100 | 1.7 out of 5 (poor) | +24% | 211 | |
| 4.0 out of 5 (good) | 100 out of 100 | — | −20% | 100 | |
| 4.9 out of 5 (good) | 100 out of 100 | — | — | 61 | |
| 2.3 out of 5 (poor) | 100 out of 100 | — | — | 31 |
Bottom line: News Medical is #3 of 5 on overall rating in this group.
9 reviews of News Medical. Filter by what matters to you.
did not give me right info and my teacher was screaming at me to the point I started to cry and I failed Psychology because of this website.
Misleading title. In accurate data in a article about plantbased drinks..probably to support the dairy industry with rather weak statements... With a title like 'news medical' I would have accepted better data.
Data wrong on covid studies .
Unreliable, one sided promotion of covid vaccine greatness when so many worlwide reports shows the serious side effects of the vaccine creating historical number of deaths within one month of boster jabs. Those who knowing tell lies will be held accoubtable for the pain and deaths caused by these misinformation
Anyone can write a CrowdTrust review. People who write reviews have ownership to edit or delete them at any time, and they'll be displayed as long as an account is active.
Polarized pattern: few middle ratings. 33% of recent reviews are 4–5★ and 67% are 1–2★.
An Observational Cohort Study", Preprints This site has observable paid content bias. Most of the writing is from India and promotes the worst quality studies when they align with their customer's objectives.
Paid for content from a dubious website with no standing. "News-Medical.Net is owned by AZoM.com Limited". "AZoNetwork can help to promote your message through a range of channels & techniques." News stories and shock headlines on e-cigarettes (vaping) are harmful, biased, unscientific and filled with misinformation. Articles are at odds with communications from NHS UK, Public Health England and the Royal College of Physicians.
CrowdTrust is a review platform dedicated to providing consumers with reliable insights and evaluations of various products and services. By leveraging user-generated content and expert reviews, the company aims to facilitate informed decision-making for individuals seeking trustworthy feedback. Its platform serves a diverse audience, including consumers, businesses, and service providers, focusing on enhancing transparency and accountability in the marketplace. Through comprehensive reviews and detailed articles, CrowdTrust strives to foster an environment where users can share experiences and opinions about the companies they engage with. By emphasizing authenticity and credibility, the company positions itself as a valuable resource for those looking to navigate the complexities of online reviews and ratings in various sectors.
This profile hasn't been claimed by the business owner.