4 days ago
Virginia Quarterly Review is a fantastic platform for serious writers. The editorial team is clearly knowledgeable, and their standards are high. I'll definitely be submitting again!
4 days ago
I submitted my piece and received a response in a reasonable timeframe. However, the feedback was quite vague and didn’t offer much insight into how I could improve. It's a solid publication, but I ex... See more
4 days ago
While I appreciate the high standards at VQR, the competition is intense. It took several tries before I found success, and even then, the wait times can be discouraging. Still, I believe it's worth i... See more
4 days ago
Submitting to Virginia Quarterly Review was a great experience. The feedback I received was constructive and helped me grow as a writer. Highly recommend for those looking to make their mark!
The VQR publishes some of the best literary work around. The submission process was smooth, and I appreciate their commitment to quality. While it took a while to hear back, the wait was worth it!
The Virginia Quarterly Review stands out as one of the top literary journals out there. Their commitment to diverse voices is commendable, and the overall quality is unmatched. I'm proud to be part of their community.
What I loved about my submission to VQR was the helpful feedback I received, even though I didn't get published. It showed they care about developing writers, which is refreshing.
My submission experience was generally positive. I appreciated the detailed submission guidelines, which made it easy to understand what they were looking for. I received an update reasonably quickly, too.
I had an average experience submitting to VQR. They have a reputation for excellence, but my submission didn’t get the attention I was hoping for. I might try again but with lower expectations.
While the VQR has a great reputation, I found the submission process a bit impersonal. An acknowledgment email would go a long way in making submitters feel valued.
Submitting to VQR pushed me to improve my writing. Their standards are high, but it motivated me to refine my work. I hope to submit again with something even better!
I was excited to submit my work but felt disappointed by the lack of communication after submission. I understand that they receive many entries, but a little more transparency would be appreciated.
Anyone can write a CrowdTrust review. People who write reviews have ownership to edit or delete them at any time, and they'll be displayed as long as an account is active.
Virginia Quarterly Review Submissions is a platform that facilitates the submission of literary and artistic works for consideration in the Virginia Quarterly Review, a prominent literary magazine. The service allows writers, poets, and artists to submit their work for potential publication, promoting a diverse range of voices and creative expressions. The platform likely provides guidelines and resources to assist submitters in the process.
This business has claimed their CrowdTrust profile and actively responds to reviews.
We're all about transparency. Companies can't pay to alter or remove reviews from CrowdTrust.
The Virginia Quarterly Review garners a mixed response from writers, reflecting both positive experiences and notable frustrations. Many reviewers appreciate the constructive feedback provided, which helps them grow as writers, and commend the high standards and quality of the published work. The submission process is often described as smooth, with clear guidelines that facilitate understanding. However, several customers express disappointment regarding the responsiveness of the editorial team, citing a lack of communication and vague feedback after submissions. Some writers feel that the process lacks a personal touch, wishing for more acknowledgment of their efforts. Despite these criticisms, the overall sentiment leans positive, with many eager to submit again.
