Threepenny Review Submissions Reviews

The Threepenny Review maintains high editorial standards and their feedback is always thoughtful and constructive. However, their response time can be quite lengthy - I waited nearly 6 months for a decision on my submission. The quality of consideration is worth it, but be prepared for a long wait.

The Threepenny Review consistently publishes work that challenges and inspires. Their editorial choices show real literary sophistication. As a submitter, you know your work is being evaluated by people who truly understand the craft.

Very professional operation with clear standards. Don't submit unless your work is truly polished - they have no patience for amateur efforts.

The publication itself is undeniably prestigious and well-regarded. My concern is with their submission guidelines which could be clearer about what they're specifically looking for. Sometimes feels like you're shooting in the dark despite following their stated preferences.

Top-tier publication with sophisticated editorial vision. Getting published here would be a real career milestone.

One of the most respected literary journals out there. The editorial team clearly knows what they're doing, and being published here carries real weight in literary circles.

While I respect their editorial standards, their communication could be more transparent about submission status and timelines. A simple acknowledgment system would help writers plan their submission strategies better.

Solid literary magazine with high standards. The competition is fierce, so don't expect easy acceptance. Their published work is consistently impressive.

Submitted three pieces over the past year and received only form rejections. While I understand they can't accept everything, a bit more personalized feedback would go a long way, especially given their reputation in the literary community.

This isn't a publication that churns out content just to fill pages. They clearly take time to curate exceptional work, and it shows in the final product. The submission process reflects their commitment to quality, though it requires patience from writers.

Yes, there's a reading fee, but the quality of editorial attention justifies the cost. Even my rejection came with helpful notes that improved my writing. This is how literary submissions should work.

I appreciate their thorough editorial process, but waiting 4-5 months for a response is challenging when you're trying to manage multiple submissions. The quality is there, but the timeline needs improvement in today's publishing landscape.