I have not seen any effort to provide equal opportunity and maintain high standards for all testers on the platform, specifically the issue of pre-testing in DEMO cycles. I felt pressured to participate in DEMO cycles because of the strict rules and pre-testing behavior of testers. Within 1-2 minutes, more than 10 bugs were submitted with full descriptions and videos recorded right at the beginning of the cycle.
Since DEMO cycles usually limit the number of bugs that testers are allowed to submit, due to such pre-testing behavior of testers, it resulted in me not being able to submit any bugs
If you are a tester participating in such cycles, what do you think? I think you will feel overwhelmed by the speed at which testers submit bugs and then as a result, you will not be able to submit any more bugs because after about 10 minutes, the number of bugs allowed to be submitted has reached the limit.
This is not something that the compliance team should be concerned with, but it is an issue with how the testIO platform works. The testIO management should ask themselves, 'Why is this pre-testing not happening on other platforms like UTest?', 'Is the root cause of this issue coming from the testers?', etc. Also, if a warning or ban is issued for 'pre-testing behavior', which testers will get the warning or ban? Because a lot of testers (I would say most testers participating in the DEMO cycle) do pre-testing behavior in the DEMO cycles. If the compliance team has to punish the testers first, I think there will be no Diamond testers left on the platform because they will all be banned.