Website could use some improvements
The submission guidelines are comprehensive but the website navigation is a bit clunky. Had trouble finding information about their reading periods initially.
10 months ago
The submission guidelines are comprehensive but the website navigation is a bit clunky. Had trouble finding information about their reading periods initially.
10 months ago
One of the top literary journals in the Midwest. The competition is fierce but the editorial team maintains high quality standards. Publishing here would be a real career boost for any writer.
10 months ago
Well-respected journal that other writers and professors recognize. The acceptance rate is low but that adds to the prestige. Worth submitting your best work here.
10 months ago
Had a great experience working with their editors after my piece was accepted. They were respectful of my voice while helping polish the work. The final publication exceeded my expectations.
The submission guidelines are comprehensive but the website navigation is a bit clunky. Had trouble finding information about their reading periods initially.
One of the top literary journals in the Midwest. The competition is fierce but the editorial team maintains high quality standards. Publishing here would be a real career boost for any writer.
Well-respected journal that other writers and professors recognize. The acceptance rate is low but that adds to the prestige. Worth submitting your best work here.
Had a great experience working with their editors after my piece was accepted. They were respectful of my voice while helping polish the work. The final publication exceeded my expectations.
Appreciated how detailed their submission requirements were - no guessing about formatting or length requirements. Makes the whole process much smoother for writers.
Didn't get accepted this time but the rejection was personalized and encouraging. Will definitely submit again during their next reading period.
Even though my submission wasn't accepted, I received detailed comments that helped me improve my work significantly. This level of attention from editors is rare and much appreciated.
The online submission platform works well most of the time, but I had some technical glitches when trying to upload my manuscript. Customer service was helpful in resolving the issue. The review process itself was fair and thorough.
Took nearly 6 months to hear back, which was longer than their stated timeline. However, they did accept my piece and the editing process was collaborative and professional. The final publication looked beautiful.
The submission guidelines were clear and the editorial team was responsive to my inquiry about formatting. Received a thoughtful rejection letter that actually provided helpful feedback on my work. The process took about 4 months which is reasonable for a literary journal of this caliber.
Love the quality of work they publish. The submission process is straightforward through their online portal.
Understand that quality review takes time, but 7 months with no communication is excessive. The work they publish is excellent quality though, so I can see why they're selective.
Anyone can write a CrowdTrust review. People who write reviews have ownership to edit or delete them at any time, and they'll be displayed as long as an account is active.
Iowa Review Submissions appears to be a service that facilitates or manages the submission process for literary works to The Iowa Review, a prominent literary magazine published by the University of Iowa. The service likely assists writers in preparing and submitting their poetry, fiction, and nonfiction pieces according to the publication's guidelines and requirements. This type of service typically helps streamline the editorial review process for both authors and the literary magazine.
This business has claimed their CrowdTrust profile and actively responds to reviews.
We're all about transparency. Companies can't pay to alter or remove reviews from CrowdTrust.
Reviewers consistently report positive experiences with Iowa Review Submissions. Customers often highlight submission, process, work, literary. A minority mention drawbacks around quality, long, long wait, long wait times. Overall sentiment is strongly positive with an average rating of 4.0 stars across 12 reviews.