DLG LEGAL SERVICES LIMITED
View company profile →
They really need to be investigated but not by DLG
Attack of the Bad Driver In early 2023, my brother experienced a harrowing journey from Goodshays Drive across the A12 to Gubbins Lane amidst adverse weather conditions, including rain and sporadic sleet. Complicating matters further, all traffic lights were malfunctioning, cloaking every traveler in uncertainty. My brother, adhering to road safety, paused at his designated solid white line before safely merging onto the road. After covering approximately 40 meters—a distance verified using Google Maps—to approach Gubbins Lane, an unforeseen antagonist collided with the rear passenger side of his vehicle. The impact, originating merely 12 meters from where the offender should have halted, was so severe it spun my brother’s car 180 degrees, rendering it a total loss. The other driver, while responsible for this chaos, managed to exchange details with my brother, revealing dashcam footage that would later become a pivotal element of our dispute. Direct Line: A New Hope We promptly contacted Direct Line, initiating the claims process. Despite the repetitive request for documentation—which seemed excessive and redundant—the insurer recognized the incident as a no-fault accident, attributing the blame squarely to the other driver. This acknowledgment brought immense relief to my brother, lifting the heavy burden of his first major accident off his shoulders. DLG and Aegis: A Frustrating Turn of Events Transitioning to DLG marked the onset of our challenges. The expectation that Direct Line would transfer all relevant documents to DLG was quickly dispelled, forcing us to resubmit the paperwork. The case's progression was painstakingly slow, with our case handler frequently unavailable due to illness or vacation. Enter Aegis, the adversary's insurer, adopting a stance of deliberate delay and eventually proposing an unjust 50/50 liability split. Despite our insistence on the dashcam footage, which could decisively determine fault, Aegis dismissed its necessity, undermining the very purpose of such evidence. DLG's agreement with this assessment was disheartening, especially as they overlooked the potential for CCTV evidence, which, due to procedural delays, was no longer accessible beyond a 30-day retention period. The lack of understanding and acknowledgment of the facts, including the dynamics of the crash and the principles of unmarked junctions, was appalling. Our repeated explanations and complaints were met with indifference, cementing a 50/50 liability decision that seemed detached from the incident's reality. Conclusion Reflecting on this experience has been cathartic, though it's highlighted a profound level of incompetence within DLG. For those navigating car insurance claims, I advise caution with DLG or any legal coverage they provide. Opting for an accident management team, if available, may offer a more supportive and efficient path to resolution.