Dream Car Giveaways
Read all reviews for Dream Car Giveaways →
Same winners on multiple draws
It's a competition site with a low chance of winning, I get it. However, the odds of it being an equally fair low chance are next to impossible. The maximum tickets available to purchase by one person on pretty much every listing, are far too high. Don't believe me, look at the past winners for many of the cash draws and lower odds listing's. You will see the same winners again and again and again. Look for the names Richard Duncan and David Olivant. They are examples of this. They purchase the maximum tickets on all the listings with a higher maximum ticket option and they win many many times. Ive checked this for months and see the same pattern. They go all out and buy the maximum amount they can, and often win. They don't do this for similar items with a lower maximum allowed ticket limit. The problem being, they are earning thousands of pounds regularly and are then using that to have even greater ticket purchasing power on further draws. Think I'm being paranoid, go back and see how many times they've won, it's crazy and just plain unfair for the rest of us. Likely this review will get flagged and removed. I just urge you all to think twice and put pressure on dream car giveaways to lower the maximum allowed ticket number. Edit: thank you for replying, however you haven't even acknowledged the issues I've mentioned. Your maximum allowed ticket purchases on lower odds items are too high. This is why we keep get getting frequent winners, ie Richard Duncan/James Olivant on those draws. People like them only really buy tickets on these lower odds items. I've been checking entry lists over the last year. They have won tens, possibly into the hundreds of thousands. It's really off putting and frankly annoying. People are allowed to buy more than one ticket, obviously. They shouldn't be buying a massive amount, that increases their chances, compared to most of us who spend sensible amounts on a draw. There are other companies that do this much better, Rev.comps as an example. They make it fair for everyone to have a fair shot. It just seems you don't care about how this comes across to us, as long as you get the cash. It feels as though some users are able to run it like a cash building exercise. I just won't bother wasting my time and money anymore on the site. Until they make the needed changes, I would advise other people to do the same and spend their money elsewhere.