CrowdTrust
CategoriesBlog
CrowdTrust

Experience AI-powered reviews and insights about businesses worldwide. Share your experiences and get personalized recommendations tailored to your needs.

About

  • About CrowdTrust
  • Community
  • Careers
  • Press
  • Blog

Support

  • Help Center
  • Guidelines
  • Contact Us
  • FAQs

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Cookie Policy
  • GDPR Compliance

Business

  • CrowdTrust for Business
  • Claim Your Profile
  • CrowdTrust API
  • Partnership

Newsletter

Stay updated with the latest reviews and trends

 

© 2026 TrustNew, Inc. All rights reserved.

SitemapAccessibility
Back to homeBack
vinroth34

vinroth34

Member since Invalid Date
1
Review
1.0
1 out of 5 stars
Average rating

Reviews by vinroth34

Southern New Hampshire University logo

Southern New Hampshire University

View company profile →

1 out of 5 stars
Jan 29, 2025

Why I Would Not Recommend SHNU

Why I Would Not Recommend SHNU University As a student, I expect my university to provide meaningful, personalized feedback and support in my learning journey. However, my experience at SHNU University has been disappointing, primarily due to their lack of concern regarding professors using ChatGPT or other LLMs (large language models) to provide feedback and answer student questions. 1. Lack of Genuine Academic Engagement Instead of receiving thoughtful, expert feedback tailored to my work, I often received AI-generated responses that lacked depth, nuance, and personalization. A professor's role is to guide and mentor students, but relying on AI undermines the human element of education—something crucial for academic growth. 2. No Accountability or Oversight The university does not seem to have any regulations or oversight in place to ensure professors provide authentic responses. When students raise concerns, there is little to no action taken to address the issue. If AI-generated feedback is indistinguishable from a professor's input, what am I paying tuition for? 3. Missed Learning Opportunities Engaging with professors should involve meaningful discussions, clarification of concepts, and critical thinking exercises. Instead, responses generated by LLMs often feel generic and superficial, missing opportunities to challenge students or provide deeper insights. Professors using AI as a shortcut rather than a supplement devalues the learning experience. 4. Ethical and Academic Integrity Issues If students are expected to maintain academic integrity, the same should be required of faculty. Universities should set the standard for ethical education, and outsourcing feedback to AI without disclosure or meaningful review is a disservice to students who seek mentorship and real academic dialogue. Conclusion While AI can be a useful tool for education, it should never replace direct engagement between students and professors. Unfortunately, SHNU University does not seem to care about this issue, and as a result, students may receive low-effort, AI-generated responses instead of valuable academic guidance. If you are looking for a university that prioritizes real academic support, I would not recommend SHNU University.