CrowdTrust
CategoriesBlog
CrowdTrust

Experience AI-powered reviews and insights about businesses worldwide. Share your experiences and get personalized recommendations tailored to your needs.

About

  • About CrowdTrust
  • Community
  • Careers
  • Press
  • Blog

Support

  • Help Center
  • Guidelines
  • Contact Us
  • FAQs

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Cookie Policy
  • GDPR Compliance

Business

  • CrowdTrust for Business
  • Claim Your Profile
  • CrowdTrust API
  • Partnership

Newsletter

Stay updated with the latest reviews and trends

 

© 2026 TrustNew, Inc. All rights reserved.

SitemapAccessibility
Back to homeBack
PAUL STRAIN

PAUL STRAIN

Member since Invalid Date
1
Review
1.0
1 out of 5 stars
Average rating

Reviews by PAUL STRAIN

GoSkippy Insurance logo

GoSkippy Insurance

View company profile →

1 out of 5 stars
Sep 12, 2025

Fully comprehensive policy doesn't cover glass as apparently they do an essentials policy however quote on aggregator site as it being fully comp

I went online to confused.com and selected fully comprehensive from the drop down box as a fully comprehensive policy is what I needed for my car. Go Skippy quoted the cheapest price. I proceeded to their site and purchased the insurance. A few weeks after I had a to make a claim for glass and was advised I had only purchased an essentials policy that doesn't include glass cover. I explained that when on confused.com there is no option for an essentials policy only fully comprehensive which has historically included glass cover. They advised this isn't covered on there policies and it tells you that on their website when yoi finalise insurance. I explained this is misleading as I didn't ask to be quoted for an essential policy om confused.com I asked for fully comprehensive. This is misleading and I'm now £382 out of pocket for a new windscreen. Their complaints team where talking over me and said its my responsibility to read terms however if this isn't included they shouldn't be quoting on a 3rd party site claiming the policy is fully comprehensive when it's not.