CrowdTrust
CategoriesBlog
CrowdTrust

Experience AI-powered reviews and insights about businesses worldwide. Share your experiences and get personalized recommendations tailored to your needs.

About

  • About CrowdTrust
  • Community
  • Careers
  • Press
  • Blog

Support

  • Help Center
  • Guidelines
  • Contact Us
  • FAQs

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Cookie Policy
  • GDPR Compliance

Business

  • CrowdTrust for Business
  • Claim Your Profile
  • CrowdTrust API
  • Partnership

Newsletter

Stay updated with the latest reviews and trends

 

© 2026 TrustNew, Inc. All rights reserved.

SitemapAccessibility
Back to homeBack
customer

customer

Member since Invalid Date
1
Review
1.0
1 out of 5 stars
Average rating

Reviews by customer

Store Panasonic logo

Store Panasonic

View company profile →

1 out of 5 stars
Jan 31, 2025

3 Faulty Units & Zero Resolution

Panasonic Microwave Nightmare: 3 Faulty Units, Zero Resolution & Insulting Refund Timeline Model: 20L Compact Solo Microwave Oven - Black NN-E28JBMBPQ Purchased: 26 November 2024 Status (as of 7 February 2025): Refund issued without my consent after nearly three months of frustration—Panasonic claimed there was "no stock" for another replacement. No compensation was offered for the wasted time and inconvenience. The Breakdown: First Unit (26 Nov): Arrived with unstable legs, causing dangerous wobbling. Provided video evidence of the defect. First Replacement: Had the exact same leg defect, proving no quality control was done before sending the replacement. Second Replacement: Same manufacturing flaw yet again. Three consecutive defective units clearly indicate a systemic issue. Customer Service Failures: Refund Without Consent: Instead of resolving the issue, Panasonic unilaterally issued a refund claiming there was "no stock" to send a functional replacement. This sidestepped accountability and ignored my preference for a working microwave. Zero Compensation: No apology, goodwill gesture, or compensation for over two months without a working appliance. Lack of Escalation Options: Despite multiple documented failures, there was no clear path to escalate the matter or have it properly addressed. Final Insult: On 7 February 2025, Panasonic claimed they couldn’t offer another replacement due to "no stock" and issued a refund—without even consulting me. This is a lazy and dismissive response to a customer who endured months of product flaws and poor service. To add insult to injury, no compensation was offered, showing a complete disregard for the time and frustration caused by their systemic failures. Unacceptable Outcomes: Erosion of Trust: Panasonic’s once-respected reputation for quality has been shattered. Their handling of this situation demonstrates a lack of manufacturing integrity and customer care. Systemic Manufacturing Issues: Three defective units in a row reflect broken production and quality control processes. Customer Disrespect: Claiming “no stock” and issuing a refund without discussion shows Panasonic’s unwillingness to take responsibility or meet customer expectations. Final Warning to Consumers: Think twice before buying from Panasonic. This experience proves that the company cannot be trusted to honor its products or respect its customers. Three faulty units in a row and a dismissive refund issued (claiming "no stock") reveal a company that prioritizes avoiding responsibility over solving problems. Panasonic, this was not just a product failure; it was a failure of trust, accountability, and customer care. You owe your customers better.