CrowdTrust
CategoriesBlog
CrowdTrust

Experience AI-powered reviews and insights about businesses worldwide. Share your experiences and get personalized recommendations tailored to your needs.

About

  • About CrowdTrust
  • Community
  • Careers
  • Press
  • Blog

Support

  • Help Center
  • Guidelines
  • Contact Us
  • FAQs

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Cookie Policy
  • GDPR Compliance

Business

  • CrowdTrust for Business
  • Claim Your Profile
  • CrowdTrust API
  • Partnership

Newsletter

Stay updated with the latest reviews and trends

 

© 2026 TrustNew, Inc. All rights reserved.

SitemapAccessibility
Home/Reviewers/Aidie
Aidie profile photo

Aidie

Verified reviewer
1
Review
1.0
1 out of 5 stars
Average rating

Aidie is a verified reviewer on CrowdTrust who has written 1 customer review with an average rating of 1.0 out of 5 stars.

1 Customer Review by Aidie

Honest, first-hand experiences shared with the CrowdTrust community.

Travel Insurance Direct logo

Travel Insurance Direct

Read all reviews for Travel Insurance Direct →

1 out of 5 stars
Jun 8, 2016

STEER CLEAR. Manipulate wording to refuse claim

Took out policy and even paid extra for an additional item (Professional Drone) Provided exact wording what the item was and the cover was accepted. Item was stolen in transit we think or taken out of the box sometime before the return leg of the trip. They refused to cover it saying they don't cover certain items carried in the cargo hold of an aircraft which was fine but it didn't say it didn't cover a UAV. Myself and my partner and many of our friends travel a lot and 15 of us were recently overseas and I made sure not one of us used TID nor will In the future while I'm without replacement from TID. We used RAC. Much more professional and open and assured us what was covered. As expected we received a response with some bull about not covering certain equipment in cargo hold like cameras etc yet my item is considered an Unmanned Ariel Vehicle (not delicate) but they call it a camera just to get out of replacing it manipulating the policy wording to suit them so they can refuse the claim. Is this not why we take out insurance. They have responded to me agreeing that the item is indeed a UAV and not a camera and offered me a partial refund which suggests they know they may be incorrect. For now I strongly suggest to STAY CLEAR of TID but I will update with further developments and if they have come good on all online review forums. It's currently escalated.

View company →

Discover more on CrowdTrust

  • All reviewer profiles
  • Browse categories
  • CrowdTrust trust report
  • Best companies research